Friday, April 25, 2014

DRAFT DAY

DRAFT DAY Review
By Darin Skaggs

     Most films are made because some aspect of the plot is interesting. Some have semi-invincible men and women going around saving the world. Some films have two good looking people struggle to keep a relationship going. Sometimes there is an underdog rising to the occasion. Others are filled with metaphors and allegories of today's world. Most films contain something that will keep the interest of someone watching. And then every once in a while a film comes along you have to wonder who this film is for. That film is Ivan Rietman's Draft Day.
    Draft Day is the story of Sonny Weaver, played by Kevin Costner, who is the general manager of the Cleveland Browns. Draft day is coming up and if Sonny doesn't make any good picks he probably won't have a job the next day. The whole film takes place over about thirteen hours before the draft starts. Throughout the film there are trades for picks and discussion about favorable players. If you are into sports most of the information and discussions that take place will be familiar to you. If you're not, Godspeed. The film makes no effort to help you understand what is going on. And it is pretty confusing if you are not familiar with sports.
    It might have been a better achievement if the film just totally committed to being moments that are taking place just before a draft, but it doesn't. The film is aware that it won't appeal to all viewers so it adds a ton of story lines for the “plus one” who are attending the movie. Sonny is faced with many troubles. In the first scene there is some drama about him and Ali, played by Jennifer Garner about her being pregnant. Throughout the film Sonny is deciding if he wants to be part of this relationship because, wait what's this, Ali works for the Browns. He is also being constantly reminded about his father who recently passed away and we find out he had to fire him from the Browns a few months earlier. So for the thirteen hours we are with Sonny, we see him go through the basic of your life changing moments. There is also a low amount of comedy in the film. It is not that the jokes just keep falling flat, they do, but there are so few jokes in the film that when one does pop up it is almost startling.
    This might be the most insecure film ever made. It is very aware of the lack luster-ness of its story. There is just a lot of discussing the same thing over and over. There are also many phone calls that sometimes go nowhere and occasionally head in a direction. Because of the total dryness of the plot the filmmakers decided to make all the phone calls interesting. They are all shown with split screens, which is fine. The problem though is that each and every split screen has one character overlap to the other character's screen. There is absolutely no reason for this. A few time the screens just switch places to keep these painfully dull phone calls interesting.
    Draft Day is an odd film. It wants so bad to be interesting that it tries every trick in the book, even good old melodrama. That attempt though is why it fails. It never focuses on one aspect of the film long enough to feel like a whole realized project.

CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLIDER

CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLIDER Review
By Darin Skaggs

    Marvel has made quiet a name for itself. Phase one of the series included Iron Man 1 & 2, Thor and concluded with The Avengers. Phase two has had films including Thor: The Dark World, Iron Man 3 and now Captain America: The Winter Solider. With the series having about an even amount of ups and downs, the new film is fortunately a great add on to the whole Marvel series.
   In this film Steve Rogers AKA Captain America is thrown into a mission to save the world from sure destruction. With the help of Black Widow, Nick Fury and other heroes they fight off an old enemy and The Winter Solider. This film both stands alone as its own and as a great addition to the Marvel canon.
   The film does what many of these kinds of films do. It has great action. The film opens with Captain America along with his team as they raid a boat full of spies. The camera follows the Captain flawlessly, you can tell what is going on. You feel triumph as the team gets the advantage on the spies. Every action scene fills you with excitement and tenseness of the moments. And Captain does not get all the glory, other characters like Black Widow and even nameless agents get some moments.
   This story of Captain America follows Rogers, who has waken up in the modern day after being frozen for over fifty years. This allows Rogers for the first half of the film to be just wondering about his life. He visits a museum where a section is celebrating him and even finds an old flame. There is a “What now?” vibe to a lot of scenes. The second half of the film explores his past catching up with him because he was focused to much on his past and not living his life in the now.
   This film does great at being a fun action film but as a Marvel film it builds the world. There are several twist that happen in the film that are so story altering that it sets up intense anticipation for the next few films. It adds a few characters into the story that will be a pleasant surprise to folks not familiar with the comics and an excitement for the reveal of names for the people who are familiar.
   Captain America: The Winter Solider is a great film. It is clear by the performances that the cast is having fun. Robert Redford really seems to be enjoying himself. The action is just as fun as the performances. The twists are actually surprising and it means something to the story of The Avengers.

Monday, April 7, 2014

NOAH



NOAH Review
By Darin Skaggs

     At one point in the Bible, God is upset where the human race has ended up so he sends a flood to wipe them out.  He doesn’t kill everybody though.  He spares one family, instructs them to build an arc to fit two of every animal and be sturdy enough to wait out a flood that covers the entire earth.  That is the adaptation of Darren Aronofsky’s new film, Noah. 
     This film doesn’t really follow the classic Sunday school tale we are all familiar with.  There are a few surprises and complete changes to the story. Aronofsky begins with the “In the beginning…” parts of this tale with God creating earth, animals, light and humans.  Adam and Eve eat from the forbidden fruit after being tempted by Satan and end up exiled from Eden.  They have three children Cane, Abel and Seth.  Cane then murders Abel.  The good people, Seth, and the bad people, Abel separate and spend a long time as enemies.  This leads to Noah living in a dark world.  He starts getting visions from God, referred to as Creator, and decides to build an arc.  That all sounds pretty faithful to the story.  Well, Aronofsky adds other elements to the story such as powerful stones that cast “spells” of sorts and fallen Angels that look like that rock monster from The Neverending Story.
     The film is pretty well put together.  The effects of the boat on the water, animals flocking to the arc are done really well and there are great performances all around.  Russell Crowe plays Noah and does a wonderful job as a man who is sent to build a boat he thinks will save the “innocent” and be the death of the entire human race.  You feel for him, he gets a few laughs out and when the script needs him to be, he is very unlikable.  Other great performances come from Jennifer Connely, playing Noah’s wife Naameh and Emma Watson who plays a girl named Ila that the family takes in after finding her abandon in a village.  All the effects are not amazing but they get the job done.
     What really makes the film is its exploration of faith and religion.  The film, in an act of genius, skips the whole part where people call Noah crazy for building this boat.  The antagonist in the film say they don’t believe in miracles but when they saw thousands of birds flying towards the boat they did not play ignorant.  They threat Noah that their village will overtake his boat when the rain comes.  Another part that is different in the film is that Noah, who has been given vague instructions from God, believes this is supposed to be the end of the human race because we are all evil in some way or another.  When they find Ila, she is wounded and it leaves her baron.  Noah thinks this is more proof God wants them all dead. 
     These aspects help explore the themes of the film.  Noah is convinced the human race is supposed to die.  Then Ila is healed, becomes pregnant and is given just enough girls to repopulate the earth.  Noah doesn’t care and goes with what he thinks God told him to do and threatens to murder the children if they are girls.  This says a lot about modern day religion.  Miracles happen, Noah is given all the material to build the boat, enough food for his families and wives for his sons all because he listened to God.  Then he thinks God wants him to kill his grandchildren because God told him to.  There was no hint that he was told this, but he goes on believing it.  With all the religious people judging “bad people” because the Bible says what they’re doing is wrong they are just like Noah in this film.  God didn’t ask us to talk or tell people that we need to judge people and say they are bad.  He wants us to be kind to each other and do the right thing.  The film is a mirror image of wrong doing religious people of now.  God does not want us to judge or be rude to others just like God didn’t want Noah to kill his kin.
     The film does have its flaws.  There are storylines that don’t leave much of an impact.  The final confrontation with the main bad guy seems rushed.  The script kind of puts all the conclusions at one point making some of them unsatisfying.  It is a good exploration of religion.  It is also pretty fun while being honest with the horror of what would happen if God asked you to do this. 

Friday, April 4, 2014

THE GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL



THE GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL Review
By Darin Skaggs

     A director is probably hired because they have some sort of talent.  After a few films it is their job to figure out what kind of filmmaker they are.  Wes Anderson is one of those filmmakers that started out not knowing exactly who he was at the beginning of his career and later came into his own style.  With each film especially his last three films; Fantastic Mr. Fox, Moonrise Kingdom and his newest The Grand Budapest Hotel, Anderson has delved deeper and deeper into his own brain. 
     The Grand Budapest Hotel tells the tale of M. Gustave, played by Ralph Fiennes, the owner of The Grand Budapest who is charged for stealing a painting that he was bequeathed from a will. The painting is named “Boy With Apple” and eventually Gustave is also charged for the murder of Madame D, the giver of the will.  Gustave, along with his best lobby boy Zero, played by Tony Revolori, try to clear his name.
     Anderson has always had a distinct style to him, which does turn people off, but others love his style.  In this film he delves so far into his own brain that he almost creates a parody of himself.  Anderson has always made motion pictures, moving pictures.  In this film he basically makes a bunch of paintings surrounded by actors which is why the main focus of the film is a painting. Every single frame could be viewed as a beautiful painting with all the colors and patterns.  More signature aspects that Anderson does throughout his career is centering the main idea of a scene in the frame.  He does this so much so in this film that Anderson was probably driven crazy that it was not possible to get things in the center of the frame anymore. With all that the film is great.  If you love the style of his previous films, you will adore this one.  Anderson pulls out all the punches with cameos with old and new players including Bill Murray, Tilda Swinton, Edward Norton, Owen Wilson, Jason Schwartzman, Jude Law, Jeff Goldblum, William Defoe, F. Murray Abraham and a ton more amazing actors.  It is pretty much Wes Anderson playing his greatest hits montage with all his signature moves.
     The film is also a great riot.  You could tell Anderson was having fun while making this film.  He has jokes like switching the “Boy with Apple” painting with a gross, crude painting.  A scene of following clues that ends in disappointment and prison escape that makes no logical sense.  He even makes fun of movies in general when the story gets interesting and the conflict is revealed Gustave says “The plot thickens, as they say” then debates if that saying is about soup.  The film is full of funny, ridiculous moments that prove Anderson does not care about our reality anymore and cares more about the heighted one he has been slowly creating his whole career.
     The film while being very funny and looking spectacular is about art.  The McGuffin in the film is a painting which is described by many as one of the best paintings ever.  When seen by Zero he gives a look of not quite getting its greatness but pretending he does.  Throughout most of the film several characters are reciting poetry but never do finish a whole poem.  This is Anderson saying he is never fully satisfied with the creations he makes and how other critics of art in general struggle with fully understanding it. 
     Wes Anderson has never been more like Wes Anderson with this film.  It is one of the more fun times you can have at the movies and it is so pretty that you might not know what to do with all of the colors.